Hey @Imranali sir ![]()
Advanced Algo Trading Series | Episode 2 I’m working on a stock data scanner using Python, and TA-Lib indicators.
While calculating the Engulfing Pattern (CDLENGULFING), I’m getting unexpected behaviour and want to confirm if others have faced this issue.
Here’s what I’m doing:
data["ENGULFING"] = talib.CDLENGULFING(
data["Open"], data["High"], data["Low"], data["Close"]
)
But the output seems inconsistent — sometimes it doesn’t detect the engulfing candle even when it’s clearly visible on the chart.
I want to understand:
- Is TA-Lib’s definition of Engulfing Pattern stricter (based only on candle body, not wicks)?
- Does it require a specific trend before the pattern forms?
- How exactly does TA-Lib internally calculate
CDLENGULFING?
If anyone has faced this or has verified TA-Lib’s engulfing logic (maybe compared with Trading View or excel calculations), please share your experience or fix ![]()
Thanks in advance!
#Python #AlgoTrading #TA-Lib #EngulfingPattern #TechnicalAnalysis
| Datetime | Open | High | Low | Close | Volume | rsi | ENGULFING candle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-13 15:00:00 | 25250.30 | 25251.40 | 25215.25 | 25220.45 | 0 | 49.95 | -100 |
| 2025-10-13 14:00:00 | 25184.85 | 25222.40 | 25183.85 | 25207.50 | 0 | 48.02 | 100 |
| 2025-10-13 13:45:00 | 25198.80 | 25217.00 | 25176.65 | 25185.65 | 0 | 40.14 | -100 |
| 2025-10-13 11:45:00 | 25179.20 | 25198.95 | 25175.20 | 25198.70 | 0 | 40.68 | 100 |
| 2025-10-10 14:30:00 | 25310.00 | 25310.95 | 25297.00 | 25305.55 | 0 | 64.29 | -100 |
| 2025-10-10 13:45:00 | 25318.05 | 25324.60 | 25303.50 | 25304.95 | 0 | 64.74 | -100 |
| 2025-10-10 12:30:00 | 25282.20 | 25305.95 | 25275.00 | 25303.75 | 0 | 68.72 | 100 |
| 2025-10-10 11:45:00 | 25284.80 | 25290.65 | 25274.80 | 25277.65 | 0 | 65.07 | -100 |
| 2025-10-10 11:15:00 | 25310.35 | 25315.20 | 25274.95 | 25282.55 | 0 | 66.79 | -100 |
| 2025-10-10 10:15:00 | 25262.45 | 25299.05 | 25262.20 | 25276.20 | 0 | 74.31 | 80 |
